India's answer to Shahed drones, visualized

A student-founded Indian defense startup at BITS Pilani Hyderabad went from hand-built FPV kamikaze drones to a jet-propelled strike UAV in one year. These are the core ideas from RuntimeBRT's facility tour of Apollyon Dynamics, drawn out as charts and diagrams.

Source: “This Is India's Answer to Shahed Drones” by RuntimeBRT · all figures as stated in the video
At a glance

One year from dorm-room drones to a jet UAV prototype

Founded
May 19, 2025
video shot on its 1st birthday
Team size
~15
people, hiring across roles
Nightshade top speed
700 km/h
jet-propelled UAV
Strike depth
100+ km
into enemy territory
Payload
5 kg
explosives
Why jets

The speed ladder: slow drones are easy kills

Shahed-class loitering munitions cruise at 150–200 km/h — slow enough for modern air defenses to intercept at rates the video puts above 75%. Apollyon's bet is that at 700 km/h, nothing short of a multi-million-dollar surface-to-air missile can touch you.

Apollyon systems Reference platforms
Bars show the upper end of each stated range. The interceptor figure is the design target for the new variant; the earlier ADI interceptor flew ~300 km/h.
View as table
PlatformSpeed (km/h)Noted in video as
Shahed-class loitering munition150–200“barely 150 to 200 kmph”
Indian Army 10-inch FPV drones≈150–200“a little slower or on the same lines”
5-inch FPV kamikaze (demoed)≈200high thrust-to-weight config
Apollyon kamikaze drone (original)300what the company started with
Apollyon interceptor (new target)350–400up from ~300 on earlier ADI design
Nightshade ADX-1 jet UAV700“cruise-missile-class tech for the UAV segment”
Capability jump

Speed, payload, and reach — the jet UAV vs. what came before

Traditional FPV strike drones hit targets 10–30 km away with 1–1.5 kg of explosive. The Nightshade is pitched as a different class: 5 kg of payload delivered 100+ km deep, at 3–4× the speed.

Speed (km/h)
Explosive payload (kg)
Strike range (km)
View as table
MeasureTraditional strike dronesNightshade ADX-1
Speed (km/h)150–300700
Payload (kg)1–1.55
Strike range (km)10–30100+
Battlefield economics

“Even if you intercept every Shahed, you still lose”

The core problem Apollyon says it's solving: cost asymmetry. Shooting down a ~$50K drone with a $1–1.5M missile means the defender bleeds money on every successful intercept. An aggressor can keep sending cheap drones until the defender goes broke.

Cost per engagement (US$)
A defender using SAMs pays roughly 20–30× the attacker's cost per engagement — and that's the successful case.
View as table
AssetApprox. cost
Shahed-class attack drone$50,000
Surface-to-air missile to stop it$1,000,000–1,500,000

The catch-22 the Nightshade creates

Flip the same logic around: when a fast, deep-striking jet UAV is inbound, the defender has only two moves — and both cost them.

Nightshade inbound 700 km/h, 100 km deep option A option B Don't engage the strike lands Fire a SAM missile costs 15–20× the jet Defender loses either way
The problem with slow drones

Over 75% of traditional loitering munitions get intercepted

In Ukraine, combined soft-kill (jamming) and hard-kill (physical interception) rates against conventional loitering munitions exceed 75% in some cases. Each square below is one drone in a wave of 100.

Intercepted (75) Reaches target (25)
“Imagine you send a thousand drones and 900 of them get shot down… it's pointless.” Speed is the counter: interceptors and anti-aircraft artillery that comfortably catch a 150–200 km/h drone can't economically engage one doing 700 km/h.
Air defense 101

Soft kill vs. hard kill

“I thought a kill is a kill.” Not quite — the two families of counter-drone defense fail in very different ways.

Soft kill — electronic warfare

Jammers and spoofers attack the drone's radio link or GPS instead of the drone itself. Cheap per engagement, but not reliable: against a drone with EW hardening (like frequency hopping), jamming “will do nothing.”

control link cut drone intact — may fly on if EW-hardened

Hard kill — physical destruction

An interceptor rams the target (kinetic kill) or detonates a small warhead next to it (proximity fuse). More decisive: “when you're blowing something up, it can't keep coming at you.”

interceptor, 350–400 km/h kinetic hit or proximity-fuse warhead
Apollyon calls its interceptor an ESAM — “electric surface-to-air missile”: a rugby-ball-shaped drone with a Jetson computer inside, built as a far cheaper hard-kill option against Shahed-class targets flying under 200 km/h. The squishy foam base is an in-house innovation that lets test units bounce on landing instead of cracking.
How the interceptor works

Radar guides the flight; a seeker finishes the job

The production interceptor engages in phases: a ground radar steers it for the initial and mid-course legs, then an onboard seeker takes over for the last ~500 m — fully automated, no link required.

ground radar seeker takes over final ~500 m · fully automated target drone <200 km/h Shahed-class 1 · Launch 2 · Radar mid-course guidance 3 · Terminal seeker

Kinetic-kill variant

Rams the target to break its fuselage — used against smaller loitering munitions. The airframe itself is the weapon.

Explosive variant

Carries a small warhead with a proximity fuse — detonates near the target rather than needing a direct hit. “That is a 100% kill rate, basically.”

Electronic warfare hardening

Frequency hopping: why their drones survived army jammers

A jammer floods one slice of spectrum with noise. FHSS (frequency-hopping spread spectrum) moves the control link across frequencies ~400 times per second — the jammer only ever blankets a sliver of the transmission, so the link holds.

frequency → time → (≈400 hops every second) jammer blankets one band the rare hop that lands in the band is lost — briefly
The founders — second-year students at the time — took their drones in front of army jammers expecting them to drop (“we just wanted to see what a jammer looked like”). Their basic ~400-hops/second FHSS link held up well enough in the trials, including against bigger jammers at Ambala, that it won them their first army order.
Why FPV drones are so violent

A 20:1 thrust-to-weight ratio

The racing drone flown in the demo weighs about 500 g but its motors produce 10 kg of thrust — a thrust-to-weight ratio of 20:1. (A modern fighter jet manages roughly 1:1.) That's what buys ~200 km/h speed and tornado-tight maneuvers — at the price of a ~2-minute battery.

Thrust vs. weight — each square = 500 g
Thrust 10 kg
Weight 0.5 kg
Thrust-to-weight
20:1
10 kg thrust · 500 g drone
Battery
6S · 1500 mAh
≈2 min of aggressive flying
Interceptor motor
7 kg
thrust per motor, high-voltage
Demo drone speed
≈200 km/h
5-inch racing frame
Nightshade ADX-1

One airframe, two mission families

ADX-1 stands for “Apollyon Dynamics Experiment 1” — the first prototype, running German and Taiwanese jet engines, about a year from field deployment. The production system is designed around two roles.

Deep strike

SEAD — suppression of enemy air defenses. Home in on radars and SAM batteries and destroy them: “a blind enemy is an enemy that cannot strike.” Without working air defenses, the enemy can't contest the sky without massive fighter losses.

Runway denial (offensive counter-air). Crater enemy runways preemptively at the start of a war — “the fanciest fifth-generation fighter jets are just fancy toys on the ground” if they can't take off.

Target / decoy

Training target. Fitted with radar cross-section enhancers, the small UAV appears on an air-defense radar as a full-sized manned aircraft — a high-speed expendable aerial target for SAM crews to practice on.

Decoy. The same aircraft sent over enemy territory baits air defenses into wasting $1M+ surface-to-air missiles on an inexpensive UAV — draining the defender's magazine and wallet.

The company name follows the same theme: Apollyon is the Greek name of Abaddon, the destroying angel of the abyss — “systems of destruction, but destruction for the greater good.” Tagline: “Machines go first, so that humans can come home.”
The story

Year one: from LinkedIn cold-outreach to a jet program

May 2025
Founded at BITS Pilani (May 19) — exams end, outreach begins
Two second-year students with no defense network cold-message retired army officers on LinkedIn; one referral from a serving Lt. Colonel gets them a no-cost-no-commitment demo slot. A professor gifts them their first ₹500 — now framed in the office.
May 21, 2025
First army demo, 6 a.m.
They show a 300 km/h kamikaze drone, a bomb-dropper, and an FPV. “It's one thing to say 300 kmph on a slide, another to show it in front of their face.” The one-day trip stretches to three as brigadiers are called in; bomb-drop tests graduate from rocks to real plastic explosives.
Mid 2025
Jammer trials → first order
Expecting their drones to drop, they fly against army jammers anyway. Their ~400-hops/sec FHSS link survives well enough — including against the bigger jammers at Ambala — to win their first army order.
Late 2025
Drones shipped across commands
Sales to units in Jammu (most), Chandimandir, Arunachal Pradesh, Babina, and the Western and Northern commands. Every unit brings a different problem statement — more than a 15-person team can absorb.
~Dec 2025 – Jan 2026
The pivot: stop selling drones, build jet UAVs
Mentor Arvind (co-founder/CEO of Tonbo Imaging) points out ~500 Indian startups already sell drones to the army — no marginal utility. Apollyon moves to the near-empty jet UAV segment: “While the country races to build Shaheds, we want to make Shaheds obsolete.”
2026
Funding stack builds up
Pre-seed closed; strategic round underway with Tonbo Imaging; seed round opening to fund manufacturing facilities.
May 19, 2026
One year old — Nightshade ADX-1 in wind-tunnel testing
~15 people. Jet engines under test at the BITS Pilani Hyderabad wind tunnel; field deployment targeted about a year out. Core value, in their words: “moving fast and failing fast — the pace is the moat.”